Section 8
- Citation
- Section 8
- Parent Document
- Feemster v. BSA LTD. PARTNERSHIP, 548 F.3d 1063 (2008)
- Jurisdiction
- United States (federal)
- Effective Date
- 2008-11-14
Other Sections in This Document (49)
- Feemster v. BSA LTD. PARTNERSHIP, 548 F.3d 1063 (2008)
- Feemster v. BSA LTD. PARTNERSHIP, 548 F.3d 1063 (2008)
- Feemster v. BSA LTD. PARTNERSHIP, 548 F.3d 1063 (2008)
- Feemster v. BSA LTD. PARTNERSHIP, 548 F.3d 1063 (2008)
- Feemster v. BSA LTD. PARTNERSHIP, 548 F.3d 1063 (2008)
- Feemster v. BSA LTD. PARTNERSHIP, 548 F.3d 1063 (2008)
- Feemster v. BSA LTD. PARTNERSHIP, 548 F.3d 1063 (2008)
- Feemster v. BSA LTD. PARTNERSHIP, 548 F.3d 1063 (2008)
- Feemster v. BSA LTD. PARTNERSHIP, 548 F.3d 1063 (2008)
- Feemster v. BSA LTD. PARTNERSHIP, 548 F.3d 1063 (2008)
- Feemster v. BSA LTD. PARTNERSHIP, 548 F.3d 1063 (2008)
- Feemster v. BSA LTD. PARTNERSHIP, 548 F.3d 1063 (2008)
- Section 8
- Section 8
- Section 8
- Section 8
- Section 8
- Section 8
- Section 8
- Section 8
- Section 8
- Section 8
- Section 8
- Section 8
- Section 8
- Section 8
- Section 8
- Section 8
- Section 8
- Section 8
- Section 8
- Section 8
- Section 8
- Section 8
- Section 8
- Section 8
- Section 8
- Section 8
- Section 8
- Section 8
- Section 8
- Section 8
- Section 8
- Section 8
- Section 8
- Section 8
- Section 8
- Section 8
- Section 8
Full Text
829 charsShortly after the court issued the TRO, BSA offered the tenants the opportunity to buy their homes, in accordance with the District of Columbia’s Tenant Opportunity to Purchase Act, D.C. Code § 42-3404.02 et seq. With assistance from a local nonprofit housing developer, four tenants negotiated contracts for sale. On the day before closing, BSA informed the tenants that it would not complete the sales unless they reimbursed it for approximately $37,000 in rent they allegedly had not paid since the commencement of the litigation -- rent that would have been covered by the enhanced vouchers had BSA been willing to accept them. To allow the sales to go forward, the district court facilitated an arrangement under which the tenants agreed to place the disputed sum in an escrow account administered by a settlement attorney.3