Section 8

Citation: Section 8
Parent Document: Feemster v. BSA LTD. PARTNERSHIP, 548 F.3d 1063 (2008)
Jurisdiction: United States (federal)
Effective Date: 2008-11-14
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/187255/feemster-v-bsa-ltd-partnership/ ↗

Full Text

1,086 chars

4
      The tenants’ complaint also alleged that BSA’s actions violated
the District of Columbia Consumer Protection Procedures Act, D.C.
Code § 28-3901 et seq. Second Am. Compl. ¶¶ 94-96. The district
court granted summary judgment to BSA on this claim, and the
tenants do not pursue it on appeal.
     5
       Additional statutory and regulatory provisions echo § 1437f(t)’s
right-to-remain language. See 42 U.S.C. § 1437f(c)(8)(A) (requiring
owners’ opt-out notices to “include a statement that . . . in the event of
termination [HUD] will provide tenant-based rental assistance to all
eligible residents, enabling them to choose the place they wish to rent,
which is likely to include the dwelling unit in which they currently
reside”); 24 C.F.R. § 402.8(c) (2006) (“In the case where a contract
for Section 8 rental assistance for a project is terminated or expires, an
assisted family may elect to remain in the project and, if eligible,
receive tenant-based Section 8 assistance under Section 8(t) of the
United States Housing Act of 1937.”).
                                 8

Other Sections in This Document (49)

Full Text