§ 1437f
- Citation
- § 1437f
- Parent Document
- Nozzi v. Housing Authority, 806 F.3d 1178 (2015)
- Jurisdiction
- United States (federal)
- Effective Date
- 2015-11-30
Other Sections in This Document (154)
- Nozzi v. Housing Authority, 806 F.3d 1178 (2015)
- Nozzi v. Housing Authority, 806 F.3d 1178 (2015)
- Nozzi v. Housing Authority, 806 F.3d 1178 (2015)
- Nozzi v. Housing Authority, 806 F.3d 1178 (2015)
- Nozzi v. Housing Authority, 806 F.3d 1178 (2015)
- Nozzi v. Housing Authority, 806 F.3d 1178 (2015)
- Nozzi v. Housing Authority, 806 F.3d 1178 (2015)
- Nozzi v. Housing Authority, 806 F.3d 1178 (2015)
- Nozzi v. Housing Authority, 806 F.3d 1178 (2015)
- Nozzi v. Housing Authority, 806 F.3d 1178 (2015)
- Nozzi v. Housing Authority, 806 F.3d 1178 (2015)
- Nozzi v. Housing Authority, 806 F.3d 1178 (2015)
- Nozzi v. Housing Authority, 806 F.3d 1178 (2015)
- Nozzi v. Housing Authority, 806 F.3d 1178 (2015)
- Nozzi v. Housing Authority, 806 F.3d 1178 (2015)
- Nozzi v. Housing Authority, 806 F.3d 1178 (2015)
- Nozzi v. Housing Authority, 806 F.3d 1178 (2015)
- Nozzi v. Housing Authority, 806 F.3d 1178 (2015)
- Nozzi v. Housing Authority, 806 F.3d 1178 (2015)
- Nozzi v. Housing Authority, 806 F.3d 1178 (2015)
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
Full Text
944 charsFirst, the private interest at stake in this case and the “degree of potential deprivation,” Mathews, 424 U.S. at 341, is substantial. The 2004 decrease in payment standards affected Section 8 beneficiaries’ rent by an average of $104 per month, a deprivation that could be “very serious to a poor person.” Geneva Towers, 504 F.2d at 492; see also Escalera v. New York City Hous. Auth., 425 F.2d 853, 864 (2d Cir. 1970) (“[E]ven small charges can have great impact on the budgets of public housing tenants, who are by hypothesis below a certain economic level.”). For plaintiffs Nozzi and Palaez, the payment standard yielded 48% and 177% increases in their respective rent obligations. This reduction in a tenant’s subsidies and accompanying increase in the cost of housing “could force tenants to forego other perhaps necessary purchases and could even force some tenants to seek other less expensive housing.” Geneva Towers, 504 F.2d at 491.