Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

§ 1437f

Citation
§ 1437f
Parent Document
Nozzi v. Housing Authority, 806 F.3d 1178 (2015)
Effective Date
2015-11-30

Other Sections in This Document (154)

Full Text

526 chars
Rosas, however, relied on the fact that there was no “pre-
existing regulation intended to forestall the implementation
of a congressionally mandated program change until
[program participants] were provided with notice of that
change.” Id. at 1475. Where, as here, a pre-existing
regulation does forestall the implementation of a reduction in
benefits for a one year period, it is the plaintiffs’ property
interest in that term of benefits that procedural due process
protects.16 Accordingly, the question in this case is not