DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

§ 1437f

Citation
§ 1437f
Parent Document
Nozzi v. Housing Authority, 806 F.3d 1178 (2015)
Effective Date
2015-11-30
Original Source
https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/3158630/nozzi-v-housing-authority/ ↗

Other Sections in This Document (154)

Full Text

608 chars 
With regard to the California Government Code § 815.6
claim, the district court rejected the plaintiffs’ claim that the
notice provided was not adequate, and held that the totality of
the Housing Authority’s efforts protected plaintiffs from an
“abrupt” and “unexpected” reduction in their Section 8
benefits. Finally, the court held that the Housing Authority
could not be vicariously liable for the conduct of its
employees, because its employees did not breach any
mandatory duty owed to the plaintiffs. This appeal followed.
18                         NOZZI V. HACLA III. STANDING AND STANDARD OF REVIEW