§ 1437f
- Citation
- § 1437f
- Parent Document
- Nozzi v. Housing Authority, 806 F.3d 1178 (2015)
- Jurisdiction
- United States (federal)
- Effective Date
- 2015-11-30
Other Sections in This Document (154)
- Nozzi v. Housing Authority, 806 F.3d 1178 (2015)
- Nozzi v. Housing Authority, 806 F.3d 1178 (2015)
- Nozzi v. Housing Authority, 806 F.3d 1178 (2015)
- Nozzi v. Housing Authority, 806 F.3d 1178 (2015)
- Nozzi v. Housing Authority, 806 F.3d 1178 (2015)
- Nozzi v. Housing Authority, 806 F.3d 1178 (2015)
- Nozzi v. Housing Authority, 806 F.3d 1178 (2015)
- Nozzi v. Housing Authority, 806 F.3d 1178 (2015)
- Nozzi v. Housing Authority, 806 F.3d 1178 (2015)
- Nozzi v. Housing Authority, 806 F.3d 1178 (2015)
- Nozzi v. Housing Authority, 806 F.3d 1178 (2015)
- Nozzi v. Housing Authority, 806 F.3d 1178 (2015)
- Nozzi v. Housing Authority, 806 F.3d 1178 (2015)
- Nozzi v. Housing Authority, 806 F.3d 1178 (2015)
- Nozzi v. Housing Authority, 806 F.3d 1178 (2015)
- Nozzi v. Housing Authority, 806 F.3d 1178 (2015)
- Nozzi v. Housing Authority, 806 F.3d 1178 (2015)
- Nozzi v. Housing Authority, 806 F.3d 1178 (2015)
- Nozzi v. Housing Authority, 806 F.3d 1178 (2015)
- Nozzi v. Housing Authority, 806 F.3d 1178 (2015)
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
Full Text
589 charsThe district court granted summary judgment in favor of the Housing Authority on the due process claims and the remaining state statutory claim, an alleged violation of § 815.6. According to the district court, the plaintiffs could not have a protectable property interest in their Section 8 benefits because the Housing Authority had complete discretion to reduce the payment standard. The only restriction, the district court wrote, was 24 C.F.R. § 982.505(c)(3), which required the agency to provide notice, but did not create a property interest protectable by the due process clauses.