Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Citation
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Parent Document
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Jurisdiction
- United States (federal)
- Effective Date
- 1977-02-15
Other Sections in This Document (48)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
Full Text
904 charsTenants might argue that, given the decision in McKinney v. Washington, supra, that the similar claim of the tenants in the Thompson case was unlikely to prevail on the merits, application for a stay pending appeal would probably have been futile. However, rather than putting the Linda Pollin Corporation on notice immediately after the escrow account was disbursed, or even at the first status call following remand from our decision in Marshall I, tenants’ counsel waited until January 29, 1975 to inform the District Court that the tenants intended to seek restitution of all or part of the 1970 rent increase. Indeed, the holding in McKinney illustrates the reasonableness of the Pollin Corporation’s reliance on the validity of the rent increase; like Lemon I, Marshall I “decided an issue of first impression whose resolution was not clearly foreshadowed.” See note 4 and accompanying text, supra.