Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Citation
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Parent Document
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Jurisdiction
- United States (federal)
- Effective Date
- 1977-02-15
Other Sections in This Document (48)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
Full Text
1,238 charsMcGOWAN, Circuit Judge: In Thompson v. Washington, 162 U.S. App.D.C. 39, 497 F.2d 626 (1973) (“Thompson I”), this court held that tenants of low-rent public housing operated by the National Capital Housing Authority (“NCHA”) are entitled to receive notice and an opportunity to make written presentations prior to official approval of any rent increase, and the case was remanded to the District Court for further proceedings not inconsistent with our opinion, id. at 643. In Marshall v. Lynn, 162 U.S.App.D.C. 66, 497 F.2d 643 (1973) (“Marshall I ”), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 970, 95 S.Ct. 235, 42 L.Ed.2d 186 (1974), decided on the same day, it was held that the same procedural rights must be granted to tenants of a low- and moderate-income housing project constructed and financed by a private nonprofit corporation, the Linda Pollin Memorial Housing Corporation, pursuant to § 221(d)(3) of the National Housing Act, if the project received both FHA mortgage insurance and below-market-interest-rate loans. A remand was made to the District Court to determine whether the project in fact was given below-market-interest-rate loans and, if so, “to enter an appropriate order effecting the procedural rights of tenants . . .” Id. at 648.