Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)

Citation: Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
Parent Document: Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
Jurisdiction: United States (federal)
Effective Date: 1977-02-15
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/7891432/thompson-v-washington/ ↗

Other Sections in This Document (48)

Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)

Full Text

551 chars

Since “[rjestitution is essentially an equitable remedy,” Democratic Central Committee v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Commission, 158 U.S.App.D.C. 7, 485 F.2d 786, 825 (1973), cert. denied, 415 U.S. 935, 94 S.Ct. 1451, 39 L.Ed.2d 493 (1974), the general principles governing the shaping and review of equitable decrees are fully applicable to awards of restitution. This court has described the standards which should guide an equity court when a government agency has unlawfully authorized a rate increase by a regulated entity, as follows:5