Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Citation
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Parent Document
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Jurisdiction
- United States (federal)
- Effective Date
- 1977-02-15
Other Sections in This Document (48)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
- Thompson v. Washington, 179 U.S. App. D.C. 357 (1977)
Full Text
1,121 charsMeanwhile, on September 11, 1974, the Department of Housing and Urban Development, which has statutory responsibility for approving any rent increase by a local public housing authority such as NCHA, see 42 U.S.C. § 1401 (1970), or a § 221(d)(3) project such as the Linda Pollin Project, see Marshall I, 497 F.2d at 645-46, responded to Thompson I and Marshall I by promulgating regulations, effective in October 1974, guaranteeing tenants affected by subsequent rent increases the procedural rights mandated by those decisions. 39 Fed.Reg. 32736, as amended, 24 C.F.R. Parts 401, 410. At oral argument, tenants’ counsel informed us that there has been a recent rent increase at the Pollin Project, utilizing the procedures established by the regulations. Thus, the rent schedule currently in effect at the Pollin Project is in full compliance with the requirements established by this court; and the only issue now before us in the Marshall case is whether rents for the time period prior to the properly processed increase must be recalculated, in order to award restitution of any amounts found to have been excessive.