Section 220

Citation: Section 220
Parent Document: Tenants' Council of Tiber Island-Carrollsburg Square v. James Lynn, Individually and in His Capacity as Secretary of Housing and Urbandevelopment, 497 F.2d 648 (1973)
Jurisdiction: United States (federal)
Effective Date: 1973-12-20
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/319420/tenants-council-of-tiber-island-... ↗

Other Sections in This Document (87)

Tenants' Council of Tiber Island-Carrollsburg Square v. James Lynn, Individually and in His Capacity as Secretary of Housing and Urbandevelopment, 497 F.2d 648 (1973)
Tenants' Council of Tiber Island-Carrollsburg Square v. James Lynn, Individually and in His Capacity as Secretary of Housing and Urbandevelopment, 497 F.2d 648 (1973)
Tenants' Council of Tiber Island-Carrollsburg Square v. James Lynn, Individually and in His Capacity as Secretary of Housing and Urbandevelopment, 497 F.2d 648 (1973)
Tenants' Council of Tiber Island-Carrollsburg Square v. James Lynn, Individually and in His Capacity as Secretary of Housing and Urbandevelopment, 497 F.2d 648 (1973)
Tenants' Council of Tiber Island-Carrollsburg Square v. James Lynn, Individually and in His Capacity as Secretary of Housing and Urbandevelopment, 497 F.2d 648 (1973)
Tenants' Council of Tiber Island-Carrollsburg Square v. James Lynn, Individually and in His Capacity as Secretary of Housing and Urbandevelopment, 497 F.2d 648 (1973)
Tenants' Council of Tiber Island-Carrollsburg Square v. James Lynn, Individually and in His Capacity as Secretary of Housing and Urbandevelopment, 497 F.2d 648 (1973)
Tenants' Council of Tiber Island-Carrollsburg Square v. James Lynn, Individually and in His Capacity as Secretary of Housing and Urbandevelopment, 497 F.2d 648 (1973)
Tenants' Council of Tiber Island-Carrollsburg Square v. James Lynn, Individually and in His Capacity as Secretary of Housing and Urbandevelopment, 497 F.2d 648 (1973)
Tenants' Council of Tiber Island-Carrollsburg Square v. James Lynn, Individually and in His Capacity as Secretary of Housing and Urbandevelopment, 497 F.2d 648 (1973)
Tenants' Council of Tiber Island-Carrollsburg Square v. James Lynn, Individually and in His Capacity as Secretary of Housing and Urbandevelopment, 497 F.2d 648 (1973)
Tenants' Council of Tiber Island-Carrollsburg Square v. James Lynn, Individually and in His Capacity as Secretary of Housing and Urbandevelopment, 497 F.2d 648 (1973)
Tenants' Council of Tiber Island-Carrollsburg Square v. James Lynn, Individually and in His Capacity as Secretary of Housing and Urbandevelopment, 497 F.2d 648 (1973)
Tenants' Council of Tiber Island-Carrollsburg Square v. James Lynn, Individually and in His Capacity as Secretary of Housing and Urbandevelopment, 497 F.2d 648 (1973)
Tenants' Council of Tiber Island-Carrollsburg Square v. James Lynn, Individually and in His Capacity as Secretary of Housing and Urbandevelopment, 497 F.2d 648 (1973)
Tenants' Council of Tiber Island-Carrollsburg Square v. James Lynn, Individually and in His Capacity as Secretary of Housing and Urbandevelopment, 497 F.2d 648 (1973)
Section 220
Section 220
Section 220
Section 220
Section 220
Section 220
Section 220
Section 220
Section 220
Section 220
Section 220
Section 220
Section 220
Section 220
Section 220
Section 220
Section 220
Section 220
Section 220
Section 220
Section 220
Section 220
Section 220
Section 220
Section 220
Section 220
Section 220
Section 220
Section 220
Section 220
Section 220
Section 220
Section 220
Section 220
Section 220
Section 220
Section 220
Section 220
Section 220
Section 220
Section 220
Section 220
Section 220
Section 220
Section 220
Section 220
Section 220
Section 220
Section 220
Section 220
Section 220
Section 220
Section 220
Section 220
Section 220
Section 220
Section 220
Section 220
Section 220
Section 220
Section 220
Section 220
Section 220
Section 220
Section 220
Section 220
Section 220
Section 220
Section 220
Section 220
Section 220

Full Text

441 chars

We are not confronted with an investor contending that the Government is unreasonably curtailing his return and subsidizing his high-income tenants with a rental restriction that bears no possible relation to protection of the mortgage interest. Presumably, the investor in a project so situated as to permit soaring economic rentals could obtain a private mortgage that would replace the government mortgage and its accompanying restraints.