Section 220

Citation: Section 220
Parent Document: Tenants' Council of Tiber Island-Carrollsburg Square v. James Lynn, Individually and in His Capacity as Secretary of Housing and Urbandevelopment, 497 F.2d 648 (1973)
Jurisdiction: United States (federal)
Effective Date: 1973-12-20
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/319420/tenants-council-of-tiber-island-... ↗

Other Sections in This Document (87)

Tenants' Council of Tiber Island-Carrollsburg Square v. James Lynn, Individually and in His Capacity as Secretary of Housing and Urbandevelopment, 497 F.2d 648 (1973)
Tenants' Council of Tiber Island-Carrollsburg Square v. James Lynn, Individually and in His Capacity as Secretary of Housing and Urbandevelopment, 497 F.2d 648 (1973)
Tenants' Council of Tiber Island-Carrollsburg Square v. James Lynn, Individually and in His Capacity as Secretary of Housing and Urbandevelopment, 497 F.2d 648 (1973)
Tenants' Council of Tiber Island-Carrollsburg Square v. James Lynn, Individually and in His Capacity as Secretary of Housing and Urbandevelopment, 497 F.2d 648 (1973)
Tenants' Council of Tiber Island-Carrollsburg Square v. James Lynn, Individually and in His Capacity as Secretary of Housing and Urbandevelopment, 497 F.2d 648 (1973)
Tenants' Council of Tiber Island-Carrollsburg Square v. James Lynn, Individually and in His Capacity as Secretary of Housing and Urbandevelopment, 497 F.2d 648 (1973)
Tenants' Council of Tiber Island-Carrollsburg Square v. James Lynn, Individually and in His Capacity as Secretary of Housing and Urbandevelopment, 497 F.2d 648 (1973)
Tenants' Council of Tiber Island-Carrollsburg Square v. James Lynn, Individually and in His Capacity as Secretary of Housing and Urbandevelopment, 497 F.2d 648 (1973)
Tenants' Council of Tiber Island-Carrollsburg Square v. James Lynn, Individually and in His Capacity as Secretary of Housing and Urbandevelopment, 497 F.2d 648 (1973)
Tenants' Council of Tiber Island-Carrollsburg Square v. James Lynn, Individually and in His Capacity as Secretary of Housing and Urbandevelopment, 497 F.2d 648 (1973)
Tenants' Council of Tiber Island-Carrollsburg Square v. James Lynn, Individually and in His Capacity as Secretary of Housing and Urbandevelopment, 497 F.2d 648 (1973)
Tenants' Council of Tiber Island-Carrollsburg Square v. James Lynn, Individually and in His Capacity as Secretary of Housing and Urbandevelopment, 497 F.2d 648 (1973)
Tenants' Council of Tiber Island-Carrollsburg Square v. James Lynn, Individually and in His Capacity as Secretary of Housing and Urbandevelopment, 497 F.2d 648 (1973)
Tenants' Council of Tiber Island-Carrollsburg Square v. James Lynn, Individually and in His Capacity as Secretary of Housing and Urbandevelopment, 497 F.2d 648 (1973)
Tenants' Council of Tiber Island-Carrollsburg Square v. James Lynn, Individually and in His Capacity as Secretary of Housing and Urbandevelopment, 497 F.2d 648 (1973)
Tenants' Council of Tiber Island-Carrollsburg Square v. James Lynn, Individually and in His Capacity as Secretary of Housing and Urbandevelopment, 497 F.2d 648 (1973)
Section 220
Section 220
Section 220
Section 220
Section 220
Section 220
Section 220
Section 220
Section 220
Section 220
Section 220
Section 220
Section 220
Section 220
Section 220
Section 220
Section 220
Section 220
Section 220
Section 220
Section 220
Section 220
Section 220
Section 220
Section 220
Section 220
Section 220
Section 220
Section 220
Section 220
Section 220
Section 220
Section 220
Section 220
Section 220
Section 220
Section 220
Section 220
Section 220
Section 220
Section 220
Section 220
Section 220
Section 220
Section 220
Section 220
Section 220
Section 220
Section 220
Section 220
Section 220
Section 220
Section 220
Section 220
Section 220
Section 220
Section 220
Section 220
Section 220
Section 220
Section 220
Section 220
Section 220
Section 220
Section 220
Section 220
Section 220
Section 220
Section 220
Section 220
Section 220

Full Text

365 chars

. The Government’s brief acknowledges that the restrictions on rents are intended, in part, “as a brake on [investors] to safeguard against exorbitant returns” (p. 9) and “as a barrier to possible runaway revenues” (p. 11). We take this as an objective to be served concomitantly with, rather than independently of, the Government’s interest as a prudent mortgagee.