The Ohio House, LLC v. City of Costa Mesa, 135 F.4th 645 (2024)

Citation: The Ohio House, LLC v. City of Costa Mesa, 135 F.4th 645 (2024)
Parent Document: The Ohio House, LLC v. City of Costa Mesa, 135 F.4th 645 (2024)
Jurisdiction: United States (federal)
Effective Date: 2024-12-04
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/10287865/the-ohio-house-llc-v-city-of-c... ↗

Full Text

623 chars

13
  Ohio House relies on these same “admissions” to support its “pattern
or practice claim,” which it has characterized in different ways
throughout the litigation. Initially, in its operative complaint, Ohio
House references “[t]he disparate impact of the city’s pattern or practice
of zoning discrimination[.]” The district court then implied in its
summary judgment ruling that a “pattern or practice” claim is a distinct
type of discrimination claim and stated that both Attorneys General and
private plaintiffs can bring such a claim. Ultimately, in its pretrial
42          THE OHIO HOUSE, LLC V. CITY OF COSTA MESA

Other Sections in This Document (107)

Full Text