Section 101
- Citation
- Section 101
- Parent Document
- Alexander v. United States Department of Housing & Urban Development, 441 U.S. 39 (1979)
- Jurisdiction
- United States (federal)
- Effective Date
- 1979-04-17
Other Sections in This Document (175)
- Alexander v. United States Department of Housing & Urban Development, 441 U.S. 39 (1979)
- Alexander v. United States Department of Housing & Urban Development, 441 U.S. 39 (1979)
- Alexander v. United States Department of Housing & Urban Development, 441 U.S. 39 (1979)
- Alexander v. United States Department of Housing & Urban Development, 441 U.S. 39 (1979)
- Alexander v. United States Department of Housing & Urban Development, 441 U.S. 39 (1979)
- Alexander v. United States Department of Housing & Urban Development, 441 U.S. 39 (1979)
- Alexander v. United States Department of Housing & Urban Development, 441 U.S. 39 (1979)
- Alexander v. United States Department of Housing & Urban Development, 441 U.S. 39 (1979)
- Alexander v. United States Department of Housing & Urban Development, 441 U.S. 39 (1979)
- Alexander v. United States Department of Housing & Urban Development, 441 U.S. 39 (1979)
- Alexander v. United States Department of Housing & Urban Development, 441 U.S. 39 (1979)
- Alexander v. United States Department of Housing & Urban Development, 441 U.S. 39 (1979)
- Alexander v. United States Department of Housing & Urban Development, 441 U.S. 39 (1979)
- Alexander v. United States Department of Housing & Urban Development, 441 U.S. 39 (1979)
- Alexander v. United States Department of Housing & Urban Development, 441 U.S. 39 (1979)
- Alexander v. United States Department of Housing & Urban Development, 441 U.S. 39 (1979)
- Alexander v. United States Department of Housing & Urban Development, 441 U.S. 39 (1979)
- Alexander v. United States Department of Housing & Urban Development, 441 U.S. 39 (1979)
- Alexander v. United States Department of Housing & Urban Development, 441 U.S. 39 (1979)
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 204
- Section 204
- Section 204
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
Full Text
542 chars396 F. Supp. 1235 (DC 1975). While the benefits issue was pending on appeal pursuant to Fed. Rule Civ. Proc. 54 (b), the parties agreed that the District Court should remand the remaining issues to HUD, so the agency could reconsider the proper disposition of Sky Tower. On remand, the agency abandoned the demolition plan and arranged to transfer ownership of the housing complex to the District of Columbia government, with HUD continuing to provide substantial rent subsidies. 187 U. S. App. D. C., at 160 n. 17, 571 F. 2d, at 594 n. 17. 8