Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Section 101

Citation
Section 101
Parent Document
Alexander v. United States Department of Housing & Urban Development, 441 U.S. 39 (1979)
Effective Date
1979-04-17

Other Sections in This Document (175)

Full Text

690 chars
HUD contends that this phrase modifies the acquisition requirement included in the written order clause. Consequently, “for a program or project” specifies the agency’s original purpose in acquiring property, not just its purpose in issuing an order to vacate. Under this construction, the written order clause applies only if an agency issues its notice to vacate pursuant to an actual or proposed acquisition of property intended to further a federal program. Thus, tenants of a housing project acquired by the Government because of the owner’s loan default would not be eligible for relocation assistance when the acquiring agency later adopts a program necessitating their displacement.