Section 101
- Citation
- Section 101
- Parent Document
- Alexander v. United States Department of Housing & Urban Development, 441 U.S. 39 (1979)
- Jurisdiction
- United States (federal)
- Effective Date
- 1979-04-17
Other Sections in This Document (175)
- Alexander v. United States Department of Housing & Urban Development, 441 U.S. 39 (1979)
- Alexander v. United States Department of Housing & Urban Development, 441 U.S. 39 (1979)
- Alexander v. United States Department of Housing & Urban Development, 441 U.S. 39 (1979)
- Alexander v. United States Department of Housing & Urban Development, 441 U.S. 39 (1979)
- Alexander v. United States Department of Housing & Urban Development, 441 U.S. 39 (1979)
- Alexander v. United States Department of Housing & Urban Development, 441 U.S. 39 (1979)
- Alexander v. United States Department of Housing & Urban Development, 441 U.S. 39 (1979)
- Alexander v. United States Department of Housing & Urban Development, 441 U.S. 39 (1979)
- Alexander v. United States Department of Housing & Urban Development, 441 U.S. 39 (1979)
- Alexander v. United States Department of Housing & Urban Development, 441 U.S. 39 (1979)
- Alexander v. United States Department of Housing & Urban Development, 441 U.S. 39 (1979)
- Alexander v. United States Department of Housing & Urban Development, 441 U.S. 39 (1979)
- Alexander v. United States Department of Housing & Urban Development, 441 U.S. 39 (1979)
- Alexander v. United States Department of Housing & Urban Development, 441 U.S. 39 (1979)
- Alexander v. United States Department of Housing & Urban Development, 441 U.S. 39 (1979)
- Alexander v. United States Department of Housing & Urban Development, 441 U.S. 39 (1979)
- Alexander v. United States Department of Housing & Urban Development, 441 U.S. 39 (1979)
- Alexander v. United States Department of Housing & Urban Development, 441 U.S. 39 (1979)
- Alexander v. United States Department of Housing & Urban Development, 441 U.S. 39 (1979)
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 204
- Section 204
- Section 204
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
- Section 101
Full Text
610 charsWe recognize, of course, that an agency’s intent in acquiring property appears irrelevant to those displaced by federal order. From a tenant’s perspective, the costs of dislocation are the same regardless of whether an agency anticipated causing displacements when it acquired property. Nonetheless, Congress chose to condition eligibility for relocation benefits on the agency’s purpose in acquiring property, and our function is not to rewrite the statute. The increasing number of default acquisitions by Government agencies may well prompt Congress to expand the Relocation Act’s coverage. 46 But until *67