Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

SEMO Services, Inc. v. BNSF Railway Company (2022)

Citation
SEMO Services, Inc. v. BNSF Railway Company (2022)
Parent Document
SEMO Services, Inc. v. BNSF Railway Company (2022)
Jurisdiction
Missouri (state)
Effective Date
2022-12-13

Other Sections in This Document (92)

Full Text

797 chars
SEMO’s claim for tortious interference with a business expectancy also fails because
SEMO could not reasonably anticipate continued business with RJC on BNSF projects. BNSF
admits in its ‘Statement of Material Facts,’ that it “has no right to direct or control RIC
employees .. . and has no right to select, hire, train or fire RJC’s employees.” BNSF further
admits that any of RIC’s subcontractors “shall be deemed the agent of Contractor, and
Contractor shall be responsible for Work of subcontractors to the same extent as if Contractor
had provided services itself.” In addition, the contractual agreement between BNSF and RJC
provides that BNSF agrees that it shall “not directly supervise, instruct, divert, or utilize any
personnel of Contractor or any of Contractor’s subcontractors ... .”