Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

SEMO Services, Inc. v. BNSF Railway Company (2022)

Citation
SEMO Services, Inc. v. BNSF Railway Company (2022)
Parent Document
SEMO Services, Inc. v. BNSF Railway Company (2022)
Jurisdiction
Missouri (state)
Effective Date
2022-12-13

Other Sections in This Document (92)

Full Text

721 chars
To prevail on a claim for defamation, SEMO must prove the following elements: 1)
publication, 2) fault, 3) the statement is defamatory, 4) causation, and 5) damages. MAI
23.06(1). Initially, the court determines if the statement is defamatory. Pape v. Reither, 918
S.W.2d 376, 380 (Mo. App. E.D. 1996); Barge v. Ransom, 30 8.W.3d 889, 890 (Mo. App. 5.D.
2000). A statement is defamatory if it clearly targets a specific individual and derides that
person’s reputation so as “to lower him in the estimation of the community or to deter third
persons from associating with him.” Pape, 918 S8.W.2d at 380 (citing Henry v. Halliburton, 690
S.W.2d 775, 779 (Mo. bane 1985) (quoting Restatement (Second) of Torts, § 559 (1977).