Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

SEMO Services, Inc. v. BNSF Railway Company (2022)

Citation
SEMO Services, Inc. v. BNSF Railway Company (2022)
Parent Document
SEMO Services, Inc. v. BNSF Railway Company (2022)
Jurisdiction
Missouri (state)
Effective Date
2022-12-13

Other Sections in This Document (92)

Full Text

668 chars
In Point II, SEMO argues the trial court erred granting summary judgment in favor of
BNSF on its claim for libel/defamation because a genuine issue of material fact exists regarding
whether BNSF published the August 17 letter and August 20 email containing a defamatory
statement that BNSF received SEMO’s fraudulent invoice. We find SEMO’s argument fails
because the statement is not defamatory but instead the contents of the August 17 letter and
August 20 email are “true or substantially true.” See Castle Rock Remodeling, LLC v. Better
Bus. Bureau, 354 8.W.3d 234, 241 (Mo. App. E.D. 2011); Nigro v. St. Joseph Med. Ctr., 371
S.W.3d 808, 819 (Mo. App. W.D. 2012).