Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)

Citation: Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Parent Document: Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Jurisdiction: Missouri (state)
Effective Date: 1986-06-10
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1747893/davis-v-jc-nichols-co/ ↗

Other Sections in This Document (52)

Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)

Full Text

567 chars

There was no contention in the present case that the defendants were negligent, only that the condition created by the parking lot was a nuisance. The ordinances were relevant as evidence of what conditions do amount to a nuisance irrespective of any aspect of negligence. As to the pleading issue, there was a general reference in the petition to the violation of “numerous ordinances of the City of Kansas City.” Where an ordinance is to be used merely as evidence, it need not be pleaded with specificity. Detling v. Edelbrock, 671 S.W.2d 265, 271 (Mo. banc 1984).