Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)

Citation: Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Parent Document: Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Jurisdiction: Missouri (state)
Effective Date: 1986-06-10
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1747893/davis-v-jc-nichols-co/ ↗

Other Sections in This Document (52)

Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)

Full Text

505 chars

Disposition of the retaliatory eviction claims was made first. The defendants moved for summary judgment and the trial court sustained the motion on the ground that Davis failed to state a cause of action on which relief could be granted. On this appeal, Davis argues, in effect, that if Missouri does not recognize the doctrine of retaliatory eviction it should. Alternatively, he contends that the facts bring his case within the doctrine of prima facie tort. We address this aspect of the appeal first.