Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)

Citation: Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Parent Document: Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Jurisdiction: Missouri (state)
Effective Date: 1986-06-10
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1747893/davis-v-jc-nichols-co/ ↗

Other Sections in This Document (52)

Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 714 S.W.2d 679 (1986)

Full Text

567 chars

In entering summary judgment for the defendants on the retaliatory eviction claim, the trial court entered no findings beyond the conclusion that a cause of action was not stated. Looking to the motion and accompanying exhibit, however, it appears that the basis for the court’s judgment was its conclusion that Nichols was entitled to evict Davis on the ground of non-payment of rent. From this it would follow that Nichols did not commit an unlawful act in terminating the Davis tenancy for which there was justification irrespective of the parking lot controversy.