Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Footwear Unlimited, Inc. v. Katzenberg, 683 S.W.2d 291 (1984)

Citation
Footwear Unlimited, Inc. v. Katzenberg, 683 S.W.2d 291 (1984)
Parent Document
Footwear Unlimited, Inc. v. Katzenberg, 683 S.W.2d 291 (1984)
Jurisdiction
Missouri (state)
Effective Date
1984-12-18

Other Sections in This Document (51)

Full Text

325 chars
As distinguished from fraud, the doctrine of promissory estoppel is not concerned with good faith or bad faith of the promisor in making the promise allegedly relied on; that is irrelevant to the issue of whether an enforceable promise was in fact made. Burst v. Adolph Coors Co., 503 F.Supp. 19, 22[2] (D.C.E.D.Mo.E.D.1980).