Footwear Unlimited, Inc. v. Katzenberg, 683 S.W.2d 291 (1984)

Citation: Footwear Unlimited, Inc. v. Katzenberg, 683 S.W.2d 291 (1984)
Parent Document: Footwear Unlimited, Inc. v. Katzenberg, 683 S.W.2d 291 (1984)
Jurisdiction: Missouri (state)
Effective Date: 1984-12-18
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1755323/footwear-unlimited-inc-v-katzenberg/ ↗

Full Text

606 chars

Subsequently, Footwear demanded that Katzenberg return the $8,160, which Footwear tendered as the first month’s rent and security deposit. Katzenberg refused to return the money. Footwear filed a two-count petition in St. Louis County Circuit Court, seeking return of the $8,160, and punitive damages in the amount of $50,000. Katzenberg denied liability and counterclaimed in two counts, Count One for $22,-520 in lost rentals caused by Footwear’s breach of contract, and alternatively in Count Two for $33,660, which Deidrick would have paid in rentals, based on a promissory estoppel theory of recovery.

Other Sections in This Document (51)

Full Text