Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Footwear Unlimited, Inc. v. Katzenberg, 683 S.W.2d 291 (1984)

Citation
Footwear Unlimited, Inc. v. Katzenberg, 683 S.W.2d 291 (1984)
Parent Document
Footwear Unlimited, Inc. v. Katzenberg, 683 S.W.2d 291 (1984)
Jurisdiction
Missouri (state)
Effective Date
1984-12-18

Other Sections in This Document (51)

Full Text

417 chars
There is no MAI Instruction on promissory estoppel. In these circumstances the instruction shall be simple, brief, impartial, free from argument, and shall not submit to the jury or require findings of detailed evidentiary facts. Rule 70.02(e). The ultimate test of a not-in-MAI instruction is whether it follows the substantial law and can be readily understood. Kirkwood Medical Sup. Co. v. Ann Patterson Ent. Inc.,