Euclid Plaza Associates, L.L.C. v. African American Law Firm, L.L.C., 55 S.W.3d 446 (2001)

Citation: Euclid Plaza Associates, L.L.C. v. African American Law Firm, L.L.C., 55 S.W.3d 446 (2001)
Parent Document: Euclid Plaza Associates, L.L.C. v. African American Law Firm, L.L.C., 55 S.W.3d 446 (2001)
Jurisdiction: Missouri (state)
Effective Date: 2001-09-18
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2335760/euclid-plaza-associates-llc-v-a... ↗

Full Text

656 chars

Tenants contend the trial court erred in that, despite its findings of fact and conclusions of law, they produced evidence to establish that (1) an agency relationship existed between Purchaser and Prior Owner; (2) the higher rental rate charged by Purchaser was not justified because a factual dispute existed as to whether Tenants were renting under a lease with Prior Owner that was executed after the tax sale, but before its confirmation, or whether they were operating on a month-to-month tenancy with Purchaser, and (3) the lease with Prior Owner was not a prior lease, but was executed subsequent to the sale, making its terms binding on Purchaser.

Other Sections in This Document (39)

Full Text