Grumley v. Webb, 48 Mo. 562 (1871)

Citation: Grumley v. Webb, 48 Mo. 562 (1871)
Parent Document: Grumley v. Webb, 48 Mo. 562 (1871)
Jurisdiction: Missouri (state)
Effective Date: 1871-10-15
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/8046745/grumley-v-webb/ ↗

Full Text

1,013 chars

“Mr. Broadhead is mistaken, as he and I did not close the controversy. At the time of that settlement, the only matters of controversy were the matters involved in the two suits, that is to say, the judgment of $11,522.54, and the pending $7,000 suit; but I understood that this was a settlement of all controversies between the parties. I drew up the two papers signed by Grumley, and the one signed by Sharp & Broadhead. Sharp & Broad-head signed the order of dismissal. I may have had them sign it because I may have thought the clerk of the court ijjould not know Gruniley’s signature. The clerk of the court would have known Grumley’s signature to that as well as to the paper directing the entry of satisfaction of the judgment. I do not know why I did not have Grumley himself sign that order directing the dismissal of the $7,000 suit. The $7,000 suit was included in that settlement, and was to be dismissed. That I am positive of; as sure of it as of anything.” iey. We did not arrive at any adjustment.

Other Sections in This Document (174)

Full Text