Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Bedell v. Daugherty, 242 S.W.2d 572 (1951)

Citation
Bedell v. Daugherty, 242 S.W.2d 572 (1951)
Parent Document
Bedell v. Daugherty, 242 S.W.2d 572 (1951)
Jurisdiction
Missouri (state)
Effective Date
1951-10-08

Full Text

625 chars
So, too, has a tenant induced to vacate by false representations as to intended use made solely to the tenant by the landlord. (Contra, Ferguson v. Buddenberg, 87 Ohio App. 326, 94 NE 2d 568.) In the following cases, the landlord did not procure the issuance of the certificate and his representations as to intended use were made in his written notice to vacate. Behrendt v. Rassmussen, supra; Kilroy v. Barron, supra; Berenson v. Mahler, (Mass.) 93 NE 2d 740; Trepanier v. Hujber, 134 Conn. 24, 54 A. 2d 275. In Gabriel v. Borowy, supra, the misrepresentations were made, apparently, in the landlord’s “action of eviction.”