Plaintiff alleged that: He occupied an apartment as defendant’s tenant; on July 20, 1950, defendant petitioned the federal area rent director “for a certificate relating to the eviction of plaintiff from said apartment as a home, stating that he desired possession, of said apartment for his personal dwelling place; acting- upon said petition, and believing the same to have been made in good faith, the area rent director, on August 1, 1950, ¿ssued a certificate to defendant authorizing him to evict plaintiff from said apartment and caused a copy of said certificate to be served on plaintiff; prior to.-making defendant’s application for the certificate, defendant had orally'''demanded that plaintiff move from said apartment and stated that he desired to live therein; on account of the housing shortage existing in Kansas City at the time, defendant was confronted with the problem of finding a place to live; an opportunity came to him to purchase a home within his income, which opportunity he feared he would lose if he waited until the defendant had exhausted his legal remedies to evict plaintiff from said apartment; by reason of the foregoing and for.the further reason that upon the issuance of said.certificate plaintiff was subject to forceful eviction from said premises if he did not voluntarily move therefrom and, believing that defendant was in good faith in making the application for eviction and that defendant intended to occupy the premises, and knowing that if defendant was in good faith he could forcibly eyict, plaintiff, and desiring to avoid. the expense, humiliation and inconvenience of a forcible eviction, plaintiff acceded to defendant’s demand that he vacate the apartment and, on September 2, 1950, began to move; while plaintiff was moving his furniture out of the apartment, defendant came to inspect the apartment, but at no time indicated to plaintiff that he, defendant, had ■ changed his mind about desiring possession of the premises for his own use. ’ ’