Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

R & J RHODES, LLC v. Finney, 231 S.W.3d 183 (2007)

Citation
R & J RHODES, LLC v. Finney, 231 S.W.3d 183 (2007)
Parent Document
R & J RHODES, LLC v. Finney, 231 S.W.3d 183 (2007)
Jurisdiction
Missouri (state)
Effective Date
2007-05-29

Other Sections in This Document (78)

Full Text

784 chars
Appellant goes on to make the additional bare assertion that, “[a]s a matter of law,” the lease cannot be interpreted as permitting the lessees to use the runways on the 135-acre tract. Once again, Appellant provides no citation to authority, other than cases regarding the general rules of contract interpretation. As such, this contention is likewise abandoned. However, even if it were not abandoned, as noted by the trial court, the lease provided for ingress and egress. There is no reason to have an airplane hangar where one can store the plane unless there is a means of getting the plane to the hangar. In other words, ingress and egress in the context of this lease, as found by the trial court, can only mean that the lessees have use of the runways to fly their airplanes.