Snowden v. Gaynor, 710 S.W.2d 481 (1986)
- Citation
- Snowden v. Gaynor, 710 S.W.2d 481 (1986)
- Parent Document
- Snowden v. Gaynor, 710 S.W.2d 481 (1986)
- Jurisdiction
- Missouri (state)
- Effective Date
- 1986-05-20
Other Sections in This Document (77)
- Snowden v. Gaynor, 710 S.W.2d 481 (1986)
- Snowden v. Gaynor, 710 S.W.2d 481 (1986)
- Snowden v. Gaynor, 710 S.W.2d 481 (1986)
- Snowden v. Gaynor, 710 S.W.2d 481 (1986)
- Snowden v. Gaynor, 710 S.W.2d 481 (1986)
- Snowden v. Gaynor, 710 S.W.2d 481 (1986)
- Snowden v. Gaynor, 710 S.W.2d 481 (1986)
- Snowden v. Gaynor, 710 S.W.2d 481 (1986)
- Snowden v. Gaynor, 710 S.W.2d 481 (1986)
- Snowden v. Gaynor, 710 S.W.2d 481 (1986)
- Snowden v. Gaynor, 710 S.W.2d 481 (1986)
- Snowden v. Gaynor, 710 S.W.2d 481 (1986)
- Snowden v. Gaynor, 710 S.W.2d 481 (1986)
- Snowden v. Gaynor, 710 S.W.2d 481 (1986)
- Snowden v. Gaynor, 710 S.W.2d 481 (1986)
- Snowden v. Gaynor, 710 S.W.2d 481 (1986)
- Snowden v. Gaynor, 710 S.W.2d 481 (1986)
- Snowden v. Gaynor, 710 S.W.2d 481 (1986)
- Snowden v. Gaynor, 710 S.W.2d 481 (1986)
- Snowden v. Gaynor, 710 S.W.2d 481 (1986)
- Snowden v. Gaynor, 710 S.W.2d 481 (1986)
- Snowden v. Gaynor, 710 S.W.2d 481 (1986)
- Snowden v. Gaynor, 710 S.W.2d 481 (1986)
- Snowden v. Gaynor, 710 S.W.2d 481 (1986)
- Snowden v. Gaynor, 710 S.W.2d 481 (1986)
- Snowden v. Gaynor, 710 S.W.2d 481 (1986)
- Snowden v. Gaynor, 710 S.W.2d 481 (1986)
- Snowden v. Gaynor, 710 S.W.2d 481 (1986)
- Snowden v. Gaynor, 710 S.W.2d 481 (1986)
- Snowden v. Gaynor, 710 S.W.2d 481 (1986)
- Snowden v. Gaynor, 710 S.W.2d 481 (1986)
- Snowden v. Gaynor, 710 S.W.2d 481 (1986)
- Snowden v. Gaynor, 710 S.W.2d 481 (1986)
- Snowden v. Gaynor, 710 S.W.2d 481 (1986)
- Snowden v. Gaynor, 710 S.W.2d 481 (1986)
- Snowden v. Gaynor, 710 S.W.2d 481 (1986)
- Snowden v. Gaynor, 710 S.W.2d 481 (1986)
- Snowden v. Gaynor, 710 S.W.2d 481 (1986)
- Snowden v. Gaynor, 710 S.W.2d 481 (1986)
- Snowden v. Gaynor, 710 S.W.2d 481 (1986)
- Snowden v. Gaynor, 710 S.W.2d 481 (1986)
- Snowden v. Gaynor, 710 S.W.2d 481 (1986)
- Snowden v. Gaynor, 710 S.W.2d 481 (1986)
- Snowden v. Gaynor, 710 S.W.2d 481 (1986)
- Snowden v. Gaynor, 710 S.W.2d 481 (1986)
- Snowden v. Gaynor, 710 S.W.2d 481 (1986)
- Snowden v. Gaynor, 710 S.W.2d 481 (1986)
- Snowden v. Gaynor, 710 S.W.2d 481 (1986)
- Snowden v. Gaynor, 710 S.W.2d 481 (1986)
- Snowden v. Gaynor, 710 S.W.2d 481 (1986)
- Snowden v. Gaynor, 710 S.W.2d 481 (1986)
- Snowden v. Gaynor, 710 S.W.2d 481 (1986)
- Snowden v. Gaynor, 710 S.W.2d 481 (1986)
- Snowden v. Gaynor, 710 S.W.2d 481 (1986)
- Snowden v. Gaynor, 710 S.W.2d 481 (1986)
- Snowden v. Gaynor, 710 S.W.2d 481 (1986)
- Snowden v. Gaynor, 710 S.W.2d 481 (1986)
- Snowden v. Gaynor, 710 S.W.2d 481 (1986)
- Snowden v. Gaynor, 710 S.W.2d 481 (1986)
- Snowden v. Gaynor, 710 S.W.2d 481 (1986)
- Snowden v. Gaynor, 710 S.W.2d 481 (1986)
- Snowden v. Gaynor, 710 S.W.2d 481 (1986)
- Snowden v. Gaynor, 710 S.W.2d 481 (1986)
- Snowden v. Gaynor, 710 S.W.2d 481 (1986)
- Snowden v. Gaynor, 710 S.W.2d 481 (1986)
- Snowden v. Gaynor, 710 S.W.2d 481 (1986)
- Snowden v. Gaynor, 710 S.W.2d 481 (1986)
- Snowden v. Gaynor, 710 S.W.2d 481 (1986)
- Snowden v. Gaynor, 710 S.W.2d 481 (1986)
- Snowden v. Gaynor, 710 S.W.2d 481 (1986)
- Snowden v. Gaynor, 710 S.W.2d 481 (1986)
- Snowden v. Gaynor, 710 S.W.2d 481 (1986)
- Snowden v. Gaynor, 710 S.W.2d 481 (1986)
- Snowden v. Gaynor, 710 S.W.2d 481 (1986)
- Snowden v. Gaynor, 710 S.W.2d 481 (1986)
- Snowden v. Gaynor, 710 S.W.2d 481 (1986)
- Snowden v. Gaynor, 710 S.W.2d 481 (1986)
Full Text
801 charsJames Raymond Roach, a homebuilder with 25 years’ experience, testifying as a witness for defendant, explained that he examined the house on February 20, 1985, and concluded that the footings were insufficient to hold the house. Roach could tell that the house had “shifted” because the block piers were tilted, and he had “seen some movements in the beams that was set on the blocks.” He noted that the cement footings were sinking into the earth, and that they had not been set below the frost line. This, according to Roach, made the footings susceptible to movement caused by the “thaw and freeze cycle.” Erosion from the runoff down the hillside further undermined the footings. It was the instability of the footings that was allowing the house to shift, which was the source of all the trouble.