Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

David Seymour v. Switzer Tenant LLC (2023)

Citation
David Seymour v. Switzer Tenant LLC (2023)
Parent Document
David Seymour v. Switzer Tenant LLC (2023)
Jurisdiction
Missouri (state)
Effective Date
2023-04-25

Other Sections in This Document (259)

Full Text

609 chars
Your verdict must be for Plaintiffs David Seymour and Joel Barrett if you believe:
       First, in connection with the lease of [the unit] to Plaintiffs, one or more
       Defendants did one or more of the following:
                1. Terminated Plaintiffs’ lease early under a false pretense;
                2. Represented that [the unit] would be “energy efficient” without a
                reasonable basis for the claim; and
       Second, as a direct result of such conduct, Plaintiffs were damaged.
       The tenants’ claim that the trial court erred by refusing to include in the verdict director