David Seymour v. Switzer Tenant LLC (2023)

Citation: David Seymour v. Switzer Tenant LLC (2023)
Parent Document: David Seymour v. Switzer Tenant LLC (2023)
Jurisdiction: Missouri (state)
Effective Date: 2023-04-25
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/10631592/david-seymour-v-switzer-tenant-llc/ ↗

Full Text

1,014 chars

Your verdict must be for Plaintiffs David Seymour and Joel Barrett if you believe:
         First, in connection with the lease of [the unit] to Plaintiffs, Defendants did one or
         more of the following:
                  1. Terminated Plaintiffs’ lease early under a false pretense;
                  2. Leased to Plaintiffs a unit which was uninhabitable;
                  3. Threatened to evict Plaintiffs because of, in retaliation, or as a pretext
                  for Plaintiffs’ efforts to organize or become a member of a tenants’ union
                  or similar organization;
                  4. Represented that [the unit] would be “energy efficient” without a
                  reasonable basis for the claim; or,
                  5. Concealed, omitted, or failed to disclose any one or more of the
                  following material facts:
                          a. [the unit] was not “energy efficient”;
                          b. [the unit] was unable to provide sufficient heat;

Other Sections in This Document (259)

Full Text