Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Mullin v. N Street Follies Ltd. Partnership, 712 A.2d 487 (1998)

Citation
Mullin v. N Street Follies Ltd. Partnership, 712 A.2d 487 (1998)
Parent Document
Mullin v. N Street Follies Ltd. Partnership, 712 A.2d 487 (1998)
Jurisdiction
DC (municipal)
Effective Date
1998-07-07

Other Sections in This Document (135)

Full Text

374 chars
stay had been imposed, nowhere do we make reference to this fact in our discussion of the validity of the protective order increase. There is no indication that the tenants challenged the protective order increase as a violation of Drayton. Likewise, there is no indication that we perceived a Drayton problem. 11 . Moreover, since Mack did not address the effect of Drayton