Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Mullin v. N Street Follies Ltd. Partnership, 712 A.2d 487 (1998)

Citation
Mullin v. N Street Follies Ltd. Partnership, 712 A.2d 487 (1998)
Parent Document
Mullin v. N Street Follies Ltd. Partnership, 712 A.2d 487 (1998)
Jurisdiction
DC (municipal)
Effective Date
1998-07-07

Other Sections in This Document (135)

Full Text

539 chars
441 A.2d 252, 254 (D.C.1982). However, the remedy of a protective order, by its very nature, has no direct connection to the Commission’s function of interpreting and applying the rent control laws. A protective order is, rather, “an equitable remedy designed to' ensure that the landlord is not ‘exposed to a prolonged period of litigation without rental income’ while the tenant remains in possession pending the outcome of a suit for possession.” R & A, Inc. v. Kozy Korner, Inc., 672 A.2d 1062, 1071 (D.C.1996) (quoting Davis v. Rental