Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

§ 42-3505

Citation
§ 42-3505
Parent Document
Gomez v. Independence Management of Delaware, Inc., 967 A.2d 1276 (2009)
Jurisdiction
DC (municipal)
Effective Date
2009-03-26

Other Sections in This Document (161)

Full Text

763 chars
IMDel argues that it did not engage in retaliation, and thus has rebutted the statutory presumption, because it did not single out the appellants for special treatment; rather, it sought possession of every occupied dwelling unit in the building. IMDel asserts that appellants “only represent 17 households in the 57 unit Property ... [and] that 22 households voluntarily vacated the Property, including those who were not on a rent strike, including those who were not members of the tenants association, and including those who did not complain about housing code violations.” There is a great deal of force to this argument, but it was not made in the motion for summary judgment and, so far as we can tell from the record, it is not based on undisputed facts.