Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Batson v. Clark, 980 S.W.2d 566 (1998)

Citation
Batson v. Clark, 980 S.W.2d 566 (1998)
Parent Document
Batson v. Clark, 980 S.W.2d 566 (1998)
Jurisdiction
Kentucky (state)
Effective Date
1998-10-16

Other Sections in This Document (163)

Full Text

474 chars
The trial court found the storage building, commonly known as a “pole barn,” to be a trade fixture which appellees had the right to remove. Batson argues that the pole barn was permanently attached to the pre-existing building and, as such, was a permanent fixture to be sold with the property. The evidence before the trial court, however, does not support Batson’s argument. Having reviewed the videotape of this matter, we adopt the trial court’s summary of the evidence: