Tucker v. Hayford, 118 Wash. App. 246 (2003)

Citation: Tucker v. Hayford, 118 Wash. App. 246 (2003)
Parent Document: Tucker v. Hayford, 118 Wash. App. 246 (2003)
Jurisdiction: Washington (state)
Effective Date: 2003-09-04
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/4935965/tucker-v-hayford/ ↗

Other Sections in This Document (51)

Tucker v. Hayford, 118 Wash. App. 246 (2003)
Tucker v. Hayford, 118 Wash. App. 246 (2003)
Tucker v. Hayford, 118 Wash. App. 246 (2003)
Tucker v. Hayford, 118 Wash. App. 246 (2003)
Tucker v. Hayford, 118 Wash. App. 246 (2003)
Tucker v. Hayford, 118 Wash. App. 246 (2003)
Tucker v. Hayford, 118 Wash. App. 246 (2003)
Tucker v. Hayford, 118 Wash. App. 246 (2003)
Tucker v. Hayford, 118 Wash. App. 246 (2003)
Tucker v. Hayford, 118 Wash. App. 246 (2003)
Tucker v. Hayford, 118 Wash. App. 246 (2003)
Tucker v. Hayford, 118 Wash. App. 246 (2003)
Tucker v. Hayford, 118 Wash. App. 246 (2003)
Tucker v. Hayford, 118 Wash. App. 246 (2003)
Tucker v. Hayford, 118 Wash. App. 246 (2003)
Tucker v. Hayford, 118 Wash. App. 246 (2003)
Tucker v. Hayford, 118 Wash. App. 246 (2003)
Tucker v. Hayford, 118 Wash. App. 246 (2003)
Tucker v. Hayford, 118 Wash. App. 246 (2003)
Tucker v. Hayford, 118 Wash. App. 246 (2003)
Tucker v. Hayford, 118 Wash. App. 246 (2003)
Tucker v. Hayford, 118 Wash. App. 246 (2003)
Tucker v. Hayford, 118 Wash. App. 246 (2003)
Tucker v. Hayford, 118 Wash. App. 246 (2003)
Tucker v. Hayford, 118 Wash. App. 246 (2003)
Tucker v. Hayford, 118 Wash. App. 246 (2003)
Tucker v. Hayford, 118 Wash. App. 246 (2003)
Tucker v. Hayford, 118 Wash. App. 246 (2003)
Tucker v. Hayford, 118 Wash. App. 246 (2003)
Tucker v. Hayford, 118 Wash. App. 246 (2003)
Tucker v. Hayford, 118 Wash. App. 246 (2003)
Tucker v. Hayford, 118 Wash. App. 246 (2003)
Tucker v. Hayford, 118 Wash. App. 246 (2003)
Tucker v. Hayford, 118 Wash. App. 246 (2003)
Tucker v. Hayford, 118 Wash. App. 246 (2003)
Tucker v. Hayford, 118 Wash. App. 246 (2003)
Tucker v. Hayford, 118 Wash. App. 246 (2003)
Tucker v. Hayford, 118 Wash. App. 246 (2003)
Tucker v. Hayford, 118 Wash. App. 246 (2003)
Tucker v. Hayford, 118 Wash. App. 246 (2003)
Tucker v. Hayford, 118 Wash. App. 246 (2003)
Tucker v. Hayford, 118 Wash. App. 246 (2003)
Tucker v. Hayford, 118 Wash. App. 246 (2003)
Tucker v. Hayford, 118 Wash. App. 246 (2003)
Tucker v. Hayford, 118 Wash. App. 246 (2003)
Tucker v. Hayford, 118 Wash. App. 246 (2003)
Tucker v. Hayford, 118 Wash. App. 246 (2003)
Tucker v. Hayford, 118 Wash. App. 246 (2003)
Tucker v. Hayford, 118 Wash. App. 246 (2003)
Tucker v. Hayford, 118 Wash. App. 246 (2003)
Tucker v. Hayford, 118 Wash. App. 246 (2003)

Full Text

426 chars

Leased premises are deemed “untenantable” for the purposes of constructive eviction under the quiet enjoyment covenant when “the premises are unfit for the purpose for which they are leased.” 5 Thompson on Real Property § 40.22(c)(3)(i), at 144 (David A. Thomas ed., 1994). If the premises are “uninhabitable,” they are certainly “untenantable.” 106 Wn. App. 811, 822, 25 P.3d 467 (2001). 104 Wn. App. 464, 17 P.3d 641 (2001).