Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Tucker v. Hayford, 118 Wash. App. 246 (2003)

Citation
Tucker v. Hayford, 118 Wash. App. 246 (2003)
Parent Document
Tucker v. Hayford, 118 Wash. App. 246 (2003)
Jurisdiction
Washington (state)
Effective Date
2003-09-04

Other Sections in This Document (51)

Full Text

276 chars
So the factual question is the usual threshold question where the claim has been dismissed on motion — whether the condition of this well interfered with their quiet enjoyment of the home, or whether the well required “major maintenance” as spelled out in the lease agreement.