Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Tucker v. Hayford, 118 Wash. App. 246 (2003)

Citation
Tucker v. Hayford, 118 Wash. App. 246 (2003)
Parent Document
Tucker v. Hayford, 118 Wash. App. 246 (2003)
Jurisdiction
Washington (state)
Effective Date
2003-09-04

Other Sections in This Document (51)

Full Text

739 chars
Dexheimer. In. Dexheimer, we rejected a tenant’s claim for tort damages following breach of the Landlord-Tenant Act. We concluded that the tenant’s remedies for the landlord’s breach of RCW 59.18.060 were limited to only those remedies specifically set forth in our Landlord-Tenant Act. Dexheimer v. CDS, Inc., 104 Wn. App. 464, 471,17 P.3d 641 (2001). Other jurisdictions allow a tenant’s cause of action *258arising from statutory duties under their versions of the Uniform Landlord-Tenant Act.12 And Washington commentators appear to agree.13 We conclude that the Washington Residential Landlord-Tenant Act of 1973 provides a cause of action for the injury sustained here. CONCLUSION We reverse the trial court’s summary judgment order.