Tucker v. Hayford, 118 Wash. App. 246 (2003)

Citation: Tucker v. Hayford, 118 Wash. App. 246 (2003)
Parent Document: Tucker v. Hayford, 118 Wash. App. 246 (2003)
Jurisdiction: Washington (state)
Effective Date: 2003-09-04
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/4935965/tucker-v-hayford/ ↗

Full Text

654 chars

The well water was tested on December 8, 1993. On March 15, 1994, the Benton-Franklin District Health Department wrote to Mr. Kirby that: (1) the nitrate level of the well water was 8.8 mg/L (milligrams per liter),2 (2) the well was free of bacterial contamination, (3) the sanitary seal was improperly installed and maintained, and (4) chemicals were stored within 100 feet of the well. And “to protect and improve” the water system, the health department recommended that: (1) the sanitary seal be properly installed and (2) the chemicals be stored at least 100 feet from the well. The health department also recommended that the well be tested yearly:

Other Sections in This Document (51)

Full Text