Skip to main content
INTERNAL PROTOTYPE — NOT LEGAL ADVICE — DO NOT SEND

Mary Cocchiarella v. Donald Driggs, 884 N.W.2d 621 (2016)

Citation
Mary Cocchiarella v. Donald Driggs, 884 N.W.2d 621 (2016)
Parent Document
Mary Cocchiarella v. Donald Driggs, 884 N.W.2d 621 (2016)
Jurisdiction
Minnesota (state)
Effective Date
2016-08-31

Other Sections in This Document (444)

Full Text

323 chars
As the court • correctly observes, because Cocchiarella’s appeal comes to us following a Rule 12 dismissal, at this stage we must presume the allegations in Cocchiarella’s petition to be true. See Park Nicollet Clinic v. Hamann, 808 N.W.2d 828, 831 (Minn.2011). Therefore, we presume that there was an oral lease agreement.