Skip to main content
INTERNAL PROTOTYPE — NOT LEGAL ADVICE — DO NOT SEND

Mary Cocchiarella v. Donald Driggs, 884 N.W.2d 621 (2016)

Citation
Mary Cocchiarella v. Donald Driggs, 884 N.W.2d 621 (2016)
Parent Document
Mary Cocchiarella v. Donald Driggs, 884 N.W.2d 621 (2016)
Jurisdiction
Minnesota (state)
Effective Date
2016-08-31

Other Sections in This Document (444)

Full Text

566 chars
In late January 2014, Cocchiarella observed a “for rent” sign and phone number attached to the fagade of a three-unit residential building. Cocchiarella contacted Driggs, who informed Cocchiarella that all three units were available for rent. When viewing the units, Cocchiarella noticed that Driggs had personal property inside of Unit 3 — the unit at issue here — but Driggs assured her that Unit 3 was available for rent. Cocchiarella informed Driggs that she was interested in renting Unit 3, and Driggs “agreed to rent [Unit 3] to [Coc-chiarella] at that time.”