Wilhite v. Scott County Housing & Redevelopment Authority, 759 N.W.2d 252 (2009)

Citation: Wilhite v. Scott County Housing & Redevelopment Authority, 759 N.W.2d 252 (2009)
Parent Document: Wilhite v. Scott County Housing & Redevelopment Authority, 759 N.W.2d 252 (2009)
Jurisdiction: Minnesota (state)
Effective Date: 2009-01-13
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1783744/wilhite-v-scott-county-housing-... ↗

Full Text

881 chars

Wilhite initially asserts she was unable to confront and cross-examine her landlord or townhouse manager at the July 24, 2007 eviction hearing before the Scott County district court. But Wilhite did not appeal the eviction order, nor do we have a record of the July 24 eviction proceedings, thus this issue is not properly before us. However, Wilhite makes the same claim regarding the August 24, 2007 informal hearing contesting the termination of her Section 8 benefits. At this hearing, the HRA did not call either the landlord or the townhouse manager to testify. The only testimony presented by the HRA to the hearing officer was that of Horner. During the informal hearing, Wilhite and her counsel had the opportunity to interject during Horner’s testimony and had the opportunity to present evidence and rebut Horner’s testimony during their case-in-chief. Although Goldberg

Other Sections in This Document (56)

Full Text