Wilhite v. Scott County Housing & Redevelopment Authority, 759 N.W.2d 252 (2009)

Citation: Wilhite v. Scott County Housing & Redevelopment Authority, 759 N.W.2d 252 (2009)
Parent Document: Wilhite v. Scott County Housing & Redevelopment Authority, 759 N.W.2d 252 (2009)
Jurisdiction: Minnesota (state)
Effective Date: 2009-01-13
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1783744/wilhite-v-scott-county-housing-... ↗

Full Text

760 chars

that (1) the determination that relator had been evicted from her residence for a serious violation of her lease is not supported by substantial evidence, (2) the notice to terminate relator’s rental assistance was proeedurally and constitutionally deficient, and (3) relator was deprived of her constitutional right to confront and cross-examine witnesses at her hearings. Because relator’s admitted failure to vacate her residential premises upon the expiration of the lease constitutes a serious lease violation under 24 C.F.R. § 982.552(b)(2), because there were no procedural or constitutional deficiencies in the notice to terminate relator’s rental assistance, and because her claims of irregularities at the hearings are without merit, we affirm. FACTS

Other Sections in This Document (56)

Full Text