Wilhite v. Scott County Housing & Redevelopment Authority, 759 N.W.2d 252 (2009)

Citation: Wilhite v. Scott County Housing & Redevelopment Authority, 759 N.W.2d 252 (2009)
Parent Document: Wilhite v. Scott County Housing & Redevelopment Authority, 759 N.W.2d 252 (2009)
Jurisdiction: Minnesota (state)
Effective Date: 2009-01-13
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1783744/wilhite-v-scott-county-housing-... ↗

Full Text

572 chars

Here, Wilhite argues in part that because the lease expired on June 30, 2007, her failure to vacate the premises thereafter cannot be a lease violation (much less a serious violation of the lease) because the lease no longer existed. But Wilhite cites no applicable authority to support her argument. Provision 26 in the lease states: “At the termination of this Lease, Tenant shall give immediate possession to Landlord, and deliver all keys to Landlord.” Wilhite violated this provision of the lease, and Wilhite’s argument that there was no lease violation lacks merit.

Other Sections in This Document (56)

Full Text