Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Scroggins v. Solchaga, 552 N.W.2d 248 (1996)

Citation
Scroggins v. Solchaga, 552 N.W.2d 248 (1996)
Parent Document
Scroggins v. Solchaga, 552 N.W.2d 248 (1996)
Jurisdiction
Minnesota (state)
Effective Date
1996-07-16

Other Sections in This Document (54)

Full Text

280 chars
The supreme court ruled that because the plaintiff obtained possession of the property “only by force of the judgment,” and because that judgment “could no longer stand” after dismissal of the underlying action, the re-restitution of the premises to the defendant “was right.” Id.