Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Scroggins v. Solchaga, 552 N.W.2d 248 (1996)

Citation
Scroggins v. Solchaga, 552 N.W.2d 248 (1996)
Parent Document
Scroggins v. Solchaga, 552 N.W.2d 248 (1996)
Jurisdiction
Minnesota (state)
Effective Date
1996-07-16

Other Sections in This Document (54)

Full Text

416 chars
The parties dispute the weight to be given the judge’s viewing of the premises. Neither Minn.Stat. §§ 566.18-33 nor Minn. Stat. § 566.34 addresses whether a judge may view the premises. In civil actions, fact-finders may view a site to better understand the evidence and the fact-finder’s “decision will not be reversed if it is clear that [it] did not gather evidence.” MT Properties, Inc. v. CMC Real Estate Corp.,