Scroggins v. Solchaga, 552 N.W.2d 248 (1996)
- Citation
- Scroggins v. Solchaga, 552 N.W.2d 248 (1996)
- Parent Document
- Scroggins v. Solchaga, 552 N.W.2d 248 (1996)
- Jurisdiction
- Minnesota (state)
- Effective Date
- 1996-07-16
Other Sections in This Document (54)
- Scroggins v. Solchaga, 552 N.W.2d 248 (1996)
- Scroggins v. Solchaga, 552 N.W.2d 248 (1996)
- Scroggins v. Solchaga, 552 N.W.2d 248 (1996)
- Scroggins v. Solchaga, 552 N.W.2d 248 (1996)
- Scroggins v. Solchaga, 552 N.W.2d 248 (1996)
- Scroggins v. Solchaga, 552 N.W.2d 248 (1996)
- Scroggins v. Solchaga, 552 N.W.2d 248 (1996)
- Scroggins v. Solchaga, 552 N.W.2d 248 (1996)
- Scroggins v. Solchaga, 552 N.W.2d 248 (1996)
- Scroggins v. Solchaga, 552 N.W.2d 248 (1996)
- Scroggins v. Solchaga, 552 N.W.2d 248 (1996)
- Scroggins v. Solchaga, 552 N.W.2d 248 (1996)
- Scroggins v. Solchaga, 552 N.W.2d 248 (1996)
- Scroggins v. Solchaga, 552 N.W.2d 248 (1996)
- Scroggins v. Solchaga, 552 N.W.2d 248 (1996)
- Scroggins v. Solchaga, 552 N.W.2d 248 (1996)
- Scroggins v. Solchaga, 552 N.W.2d 248 (1996)
- Scroggins v. Solchaga, 552 N.W.2d 248 (1996)
- Scroggins v. Solchaga, 552 N.W.2d 248 (1996)
- Scroggins v. Solchaga, 552 N.W.2d 248 (1996)
- Scroggins v. Solchaga, 552 N.W.2d 248 (1996)
- Scroggins v. Solchaga, 552 N.W.2d 248 (1996)
- Scroggins v. Solchaga, 552 N.W.2d 248 (1996)
- Scroggins v. Solchaga, 552 N.W.2d 248 (1996)
- Scroggins v. Solchaga, 552 N.W.2d 248 (1996)
- Scroggins v. Solchaga, 552 N.W.2d 248 (1996)
- Scroggins v. Solchaga, 552 N.W.2d 248 (1996)
- Scroggins v. Solchaga, 552 N.W.2d 248 (1996)
- Scroggins v. Solchaga, 552 N.W.2d 248 (1996)
- Scroggins v. Solchaga, 552 N.W.2d 248 (1996)
- Scroggins v. Solchaga, 552 N.W.2d 248 (1996)
- Scroggins v. Solchaga, 552 N.W.2d 248 (1996)
- Scroggins v. Solchaga, 552 N.W.2d 248 (1996)
- Scroggins v. Solchaga, 552 N.W.2d 248 (1996)
- Scroggins v. Solchaga, 552 N.W.2d 248 (1996)
- Scroggins v. Solchaga, 552 N.W.2d 248 (1996)
- Scroggins v. Solchaga, 552 N.W.2d 248 (1996)
- Scroggins v. Solchaga, 552 N.W.2d 248 (1996)
- Scroggins v. Solchaga, 552 N.W.2d 248 (1996)
- Scroggins v. Solchaga, 552 N.W.2d 248 (1996)
- Scroggins v. Solchaga, 552 N.W.2d 248 (1996)
- Scroggins v. Solchaga, 552 N.W.2d 248 (1996)
- Scroggins v. Solchaga, 552 N.W.2d 248 (1996)
- Scroggins v. Solchaga, 552 N.W.2d 248 (1996)
- Scroggins v. Solchaga, 552 N.W.2d 248 (1996)
- Scroggins v. Solchaga, 552 N.W.2d 248 (1996)
- Scroggins v. Solchaga, 552 N.W.2d 248 (1996)
- Scroggins v. Solchaga, 552 N.W.2d 248 (1996)
- Scroggins v. Solchaga, 552 N.W.2d 248 (1996)
- Scroggins v. Solchaga, 552 N.W.2d 248 (1996)
- Scroggins v. Solchaga, 552 N.W.2d 248 (1996)
- Scroggins v. Solchaga, 552 N.W.2d 248 (1996)
- Scroggins v. Solchaga, 552 N.W.2d 248 (1996)
- Scroggins v. Solchaga, 552 N.W.2d 248 (1996)
Full Text
1,032 charsOn this record, some of the property’s problems may have been caused, prolonged, or exacerbated by tenant and we see no abuse of the district court’s discretion in refusing to use the property’s condition as a basis for ordering retroactive rent abatement, particularly in light of the promise on landlord’s behalf to abide by any district court order for repairs. If tenant had either paid rent to landlord or put the rent in escrow with the court, money would have been available for repairs. Also, landlord’s handyman stated that when he tried to repair the property, tenant threatened him with arrest, and tenant admits to “hinting” at calling the police if landlord’s handyman arrived on the property. Further, landlord’s handyman stated that tenant caused much of the leaky roof problem by putting a sprinkler on the roof. The fact that some of the property’s problems may have been tenant’s fault also leads us to conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in its refusal to award tenant attorney fees. See