Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Hoglund-Hall v. Kleinschmidt, 381 N.W.2d 889 (1986)

Citation
Hoglund-Hall v. Kleinschmidt, 381 N.W.2d 889 (1986)
Parent Document
Hoglund-Hall v. Kleinschmidt, 381 N.W.2d 889 (1986)
Jurisdiction
Minnesota (state)
Effective Date
1986-02-18

Other Sections in This Document (80)

Full Text

494 chars
The trial court’s finding that appellants’ continued presence in the Brittland Apartment complex constituted a threat to the safety of the other tenants and to the management was supported by the record and was proper. However, the trial court erred by making findings which effectively held that applicable FmHA regulations were complied with. Notice of termination requirements under the federal regulations supercede state law. The regulations must be complied with before the apartment *896